- With $140-billion-plus in cash, analysts described 2020 as another year in which the lack of a transformative deal from Warren Buffett weighed on investor sentiment.
- Buffett's biggest buy: at least $18 billion in buybacks of Berkshire Hathaway shares.
- The 2019-2020 two-year performance gap between Buffet and the S&P 500 index was among the widest by which he has ever trailed, at 37%.
- If the market takes a turn for the worse, Berkshire could be inexpensive. Almost half of Berkshire's roughly $500 billion market cap is currently represented by balance sheet cash and its Apple stake, and his last big losing streak against the index was followed by a surge.
In this article
Warren Buffett during an interview with CNBC's Becky Quick on February 24, 2020. It turned out to be another year during which the billionaire investor shied away from game-changing acquisitions.Gerald Miller | CNBC
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway made some big purchases in 2020, but the biggest Buffett buy speaks to the big challenge the company will continue to face: there was nothing it could find at a better price than its own shares.
Berkshire bought back more than $18 billion in its own shares last year, through October, almost twice as much as Buffett spent on his next biggest acquisition, the $10 billion natural gas assets transaction with Dominion Energy, which including the debt acquired, was the largest acquisition since 2016. Taken at his word — which he has earned — that he won't do a share repurchase just to prop up the stock, the big buyback was a signal from Buffett that he thinks the stock is undervalued.
"If he had acquired a portfolio company for $18 billion or purchased $18 billion in the stock of a public company, we would call it significant," said James Shanahan, Edward Jones analyst, who estimated the buybacks through Oct. at $18.4 billion and maintains a positive outlook on Berkshire shares.
"Few better places for Berkshire to allocate its capital than to investing in itself with share buybacks," says Lawrence Cunningham, author of several books about Warren Buffett and Berkshire, and a professor at George Washington University. "Price was right. Disclosure was clear. Pure investment rationality."
Even if Buffett is making the right call on the buybacks, the size of it being bigger than any M&A acquisition since 2016's deal for Precision Castparts highlights a reason Berkshire has struggled to keep up with the broader market in recent years: investors don't see Buffett being able to make the bold bets that made his name and so many Berkshire shareholders' fortunes.
Over the past two decades, Buffett has done reasonably well against the index, actually beating the S&P 500 in 12 calendar years between 1999 and 2020. Though years in which Berkshire has trailed have included some big margins and resulted in the company lagging the index over the past 5-, 10- and 15-year periods, according to data from S&P Global.
In 2020, Berkshire Hathaway shares were up, but not by much (2%), against an S&P 500 that gained over 18%, with dividends reinvested, according to S&P Global. Taken together, the two-year stretch of 2019 and 2020 marked one of the biggest gaps between Berkshire and the broader U.S. stock market in recent history, with the Buffett trailing the index return by a combined 37%.
At least in the short-term, investor sentiment is against the company because market forces are working against him. The market Buffett faces is defined by record low interest rates — which the Fed has signalled will remain the norm for some time — making more cheap debt available to fund acquisitions from competitors, such as private equity, that don't now need the cash reserves of a Berkshire. As a result, asset prices across the market are elevated.
"No one is contesting his multi-decade track record, the intelligent use of cheap flows to build tremendous value over time. He has done that repeatedly, but now capital is cheap for everyone," says Meyer Shields, a KBW analyst. "It diminishes his advantage. It was an element of the secret sauce, but maybe the best of bad choices is to not buy anything."
Shields, who has covered Berkshire Hathaway for a long time, often critically, and has had the distinction of being excluded from analyst invitations to the company's annual meetings, says Buffett can be right about not overpaying and still be punished by investors for that decision. "It mostly comes down to valuation for acquisition opportunities and barring some crash, I don't see tremendous opportunities for acquisitions going forward. We are stuck with the idea that they have a ton of capital, but so does everyone."
Between the pandemic onset and through the May virtual annual meeting — where Charlie Munger was notably replaced by Berkshire Hathaway Energy head Greg Abel as Buffett's counterpart, which will be the case again this year as speculation centers on Abel as the first post-Buffett CEO — frustration with the pace of investment activity grew. Buffett was uncharacteristically fearful when others were fearful, too.
"It was fair for them to be concerned about the implications of the pandemic. But people were nervous because they didn't see opportunities … and they didn't see attractive stocks to buy, and weren't even buying back their own stock, just hoarding cash and people worried about what he would do with it," Shanahan said.
In March, no one had a handle on what mortality rates from the pandemic would be, or how the government would act, and Berkshire's long-term history shows that Buffett holds cash during periods of risk. "There might have been some disappointment, but he was being consistent," Shields said, even when it came to not rushing to buy back Berkshire shares.
The worst thing that can happen is they aren't deploying capital. I would like to see much more cash put to work. It is a huge driver of earnings and market cap.James Shanahan, Edward Jones analyst
The distressed investments Buffett was able to make in the last financial crisis of 2008, meanwhile, were not repeatable during the pandemic, as the government acted rapidly to stimulate the economy and support devastated industries.
"This time around government support was swift, rolled out so much faster than in 2008," Shanahan said.
The one investment that ultimately helped to boost investors confidence starting in the summer was the increased buyback activity being disclosed. "They got aggressive with the buybacks from June through October. There is not as much competition to buy back his own stock," Shanahan said.
Cunningham expects more of the same: "Added bonus: get rid of the short-term Berkshire shareholders, such as Bill Ackman, in favor of the true believers. … expect continued repetition."
The $145 billion last reported in cash by Berkshire does need to move to keep the stock moving higher.
"The worst thing that can happen is they aren't deploying capital. I would like to see much more cash put to work. It is a huge driver of earnings and market cap," said Shanahan. "But there are very few acquisitions over $20 billion. … Capital deployment in excess of cash generation will drive the stock and the easiest way to accomplish that is buybacks."
Precision Castparts, in 2016, was a $37 billion deal.
In recent years Buffett has made clear that assets are so pricey, his preference is to focus on buying more stocks of public companies. But that had the unintended consequence of making some of his smaller missteps with those public stock holdings more notable in 2020.
Berkshire sold the big stake it had recently built in airline stocks including American, Delta, United and Southwest, early in Q2 2020, possibly near trough valuations. And through the end of the second quarter, Berkshire was a net seller of stocks. Its reduced holdings of financial stocks, including investments in Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan, PNC, M&T Bank and Bank of NY Mellon — which in the broader scheme of things should attract more investors as the public stock portfolio tilts more to tech and consumer trends — did include some questionable timing decisions.
"The airline stocks was messy,. He certainly sold at a bad time and was liquidating bank stocks at cheap valuations. JP Morgan has rallied a lot," said Shanahan. "Those were timing mistakes. With the airlines it was the right thing to do, but the wrong time to do it."
Buffett has been loading up on Bank of America as his No. 1 bank stock for the future. "Bank of America has been a homerun," Shanahan said of the investment agreement first reached in 2011 when Berkshire bought $5 billion in bank preferred shares and the right to 700 million in common shares over a decade at a price of roughly $7 per share, which currently trades above $30.
"Getting rid of some of the financials was my biggest frustration," said Greg Womack, president of Womack Investment Advisers, which has held Berkshire as a core portfolio stock across many client accounts. "The timing hasn't always been the best … but I don't think they look so much at the technicals."
With more of the investment decision-making being in the hands of hedge fund managers brought in-house years ago,Ted Weschler and Todd Combs, the timing decisions could change more in the future, analysts and investors say. The recent past has seen a significant shift in the stock portfolio managed by Berkshire.
At the end of 2018, the portfolio was still "handcuffed by financials," Shanahan said.
Even with Apple as its largest stock holding — which has proved to be a great investment in tech by Buffett after his IBM stumble and has grown so much Berkshire was led to trim the position last year — Berkshire's internal managers who have discretion to buy in the billions of dollars have been underweight technology, and that is one reason it has trailed the S&P 500.
"These portfolio managers charged with trying to outperform the market didn't own stocks in the sector that was the strongest performing," Shanahan said. "Financials like Wells Fargo and U.S. Bank sort of set them up to underperform into 2019 and 2020. It is a hard thing to do, hard to beat the market, when you have large percentages in value stocks. They took action."
Tech investments Buffett didn't used to think he understood. The industry is easier to understand now, and unavoidable.Lawrence Cunningham, George Washington University professor and author of several books on Berkshire
Since the end of 2018, Berkshire's stock portfolio exposure to financials has fallen from 49% to 28%, while tech has swelled, primarily due to Apple. Technology and consumer stocks are now close to 50% of the public company holdings. Stocks that have appeared in recent years include Amazon, T-Mobile and, in the most recent quarter, a handful of health-care stocks.
"Tech, communication services, health care. It is starting to have more of a new economy feel and look more like the market," Shanahan said. In the Sept. 2020 quarter alone, Berkshire disclosed $7 billion in new positions in tech, communications and health care sectors. Health-care stock Davita is a major Berkshire holding, but the company has not historically invested much in health care sector relative to other sectors.
The most surprising new portfolio direction was Berkshire's first-ever U.S. IPO investment, Snowflake, which turned out to be the biggest tech software IPO in history.
"Tech investments Buffett didn't used to think he understood. The industry is easier to understand now, and unavoidable," Cunningham said. "But those companies [Apple, Snowflake] are still very much Berkshire kinds of companies, led by long-term strategic thinkers who want to have high quality shareholders."
Snowflake may have been in investment led by Todd Combs, who Shanahan noted has signed the paperwork on the deal and was also behind Berkshire Hathaway's investment in Brazilian credit-card-processing company Stoneco, which was made just days after the IPO in late 2018.
A very Buffett-like deal in support of Scripps' acquisition of ION Media, was led by the other manager Ted Weschler, through which Berkshire invested $600 million in preferred stock (8% dividend if paid in cash, 9% if deferred).